In a striking turn of events, Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway disclosed in its February 2025 13F filing an unprecedented cash reserve amounting to $334 billion, which represents a staggering 30% of its overall investment portfolioSimultaneously, the company has reduced its holdings in bank stocks to a record low not seen since the financial crisis of 2008. This cautionary “cash is king” stance of Buffett stands in stark contrast to the exuberance of technology stocks in the U.S. equity market, where individual investors are cheering Nvidia’s soaring valuations on platforms like RobinhoodAs retail investors celebrate, Buffett quietly accumulates cash—a stark reminder of the age-old valuation narratives that tend to repeat in cycles.

For two consecutive years, Berkshire’s cash levels have been soaring to new heights, suggesting a radical shift in Buffett’s usual investment strategies, typically characterized by continuous investment in value stocks

Advertisements

Generally, it is believed that cash represents "idle capital," yet Buffett views it as a strategic reserve to counter potential “black swan” events that could disrupt the marketFollowing the collapse of regional banks like Silicon Valley Bank in 2024, Buffett’s war chest is now capable of purchasing an astounding 2.3 Coca-Cola companiesThis prudent, "crisis hunter" mentality reflects Buffett’s deep-seated historical wisdom gained from his previous sell-off in 1969 and the market bottoming-out he executed after the 1987 crash.

Moreover, the dynamics of Berkshire's portfolio are changing significantlyNotably, its top five holdings have seen a dramatic reduction in their stakes; for instance, Apple's share has decreased from 42% in 2023 to a notable 31%. American Bank has been entirely offloaded, replaced by considerable positions in energy stocks such as Occidental Petroleum and ChevronThis shift away from financial sectors towards tangible resources emphasizes Buffett’s growing skepticism regarding the dollar system's stabilityWhile the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet is still hovering around a staggering $4.5 trillion, commodities and energy might represent a more resilient form of "digital gold."

The rise of Nvidia's stock price in March 2025, reaching over $12,000 (post-split), marked a peak in the AI speculative bubbleHere is a company whose annual revenue barely exceeds $60 billion, but its market cap has eclipsed the entire constituent stocks of Germany's DAX indexThe major tech players—Meta, Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Apple, and Tesla—are engaged in a fevered arms race in the AI sector, leading to a bizarre cycle of capital: the acquisition of Nvidia chips that gets recorded as capital expenditure, the elongation of depreciation periods from three to five years, artificially inflating profits, surging stock prices, and ultimately stock issuances that perpetuate further chip acquisition

Advertisements

The mathematics behind these financial gymnastics is alarming; just imagine a firm spending $10 billion on H100 chips, whose new linear depreciation would half its annual costs significantly, resulting in a considerable boost in net profits.

The absurdity heightens with AI being touted as revolutionizing the future, though actual performance metrics tell a contrasting storyWith XAI’s lab possessing 200,000 H100 graphics cards contrasted against DeepSeek’s mere 760 units, it’s evident there is an expletive gap in computational powerFurthermore, OpenAI’s research has illuminated that as model parameters exceed one trillion, enhancing computational power only marginally increases task accuracyThe so-called “law of diminishing returns” in computing power is dragging tech giants into a “Sisyphus trap”—where investments do not yield proportional resultsMeta, spending $20 billion annually on AI R&D, managed to nudge its LLaMA model's accuracy only 2% higher, which is an astoundingly poor return on investment.

As Berkshire mounts cash reserves, the opposite is at play on Wall Street, where hedge funds are embroiled in “suicidal long positions.” Reports from Goldman Sachs Prime Brokerage illustrate that hedge funds have reached a net leverage ratio of 2.8, the highest since 2007. Nvidia’s shareholder list features prominent quant firms like Citadel and Two Sigma, holding over 25% of the shares, notably with their trading models heavily weighted towards trend-following strategiesThis obsession with momentum is steering the market toward a self-fulfilling prophecy of inflated valuations, while retail investors are even more fervently hunting for tech stocks

Advertisements

On the Robinhood platform, the ticker symbol "NVDA" has become the most searched stock, with 42% of newly opened accounts featuring first-time purchases of technology stocksData from TD Ameritrade indicates that 67% of investors under the age of 35 hold technology stocks, vastly surpassing the 49% levels observed during the internet bubble of 2000.

This rampant enthusiasm among tech stocks is underpinned by unprecedented financial leverage within these corporationsThe net debt across the six major tech companies has ballooned from $1.2 trillion in 2020 to $2.8 trillion, with their interest coverage ratio (EBIT/interest expenses) declining from 7.2x to 3.1xAs yields on 10-year U.STreasury bonds exceed 4.5%, these firms are faced with an annual increase of $12 billion in interest payments—equivalent to the expenditure of launching 1.5 SpaceX Starships each dayMore subtly, risks associated with equity pledges have surfacedAccording to FactSet, tech executives have pledged stocks valued at $1.4 trillion, jeopardizing their holdings with trigger points for forced liquidations if stock prices dip substantially.

The endgame for this monumental bubble could arise from several potential instigators: First, a resurgence of interest rate hikes from the Federal Reserve could burst the inflated valuations; second, breakthroughs in Chinese AI chips could disrupt Nvidia’s dominant position; and lastly, the implementation of the EU Artificial Intelligence Act may impose heavy compliance costs on tech companiesRegardless of which direction the tide turns, once the last investment "hot potato" falls into the hands of retail investors, a staggering $30 trillion in market value could evaporate from the U.S. stock market within just six months—equivalent to one-third of the global GDP

It is important to note that while history does not repeat itself precisely, it often exhibits thematic rhymesPrior to the Great Depression in 1929, the Dow Jones index had a price-to-sales ratio of 2.7; today, the Nasdaq 100 stands at a ratio of 4.3. Similarly, the collapse of the dot-com bubble in 2000 showed tech stocks constituting 31% of the S&P 500; this percentage rests at 38% todayEven more troubling is that the average debt-to-income ratio for retail investors of Generation Z has reached 187%, notably exceeding the 136% benchmark seen in 2007.

Ultimately, Buffett's staggering cash reserve represents a deep ethical inquiry into the cubicles of “digital capitalism.” As tech companies concoct financial alchemies to exhibit growth, when investors opt for momentum models in lieu of rudimentary analysis, and central banks use quantitative easing to boost asset prices, the current bubble transcends mere economic cycles, emerging instead as a systemic risk during a transformative civilizational eraWhile Berkshire’s cash fortress may not shield from the impending deluge, it undeniably stands as the last bastion for rationality amidst a sea of speculative frenzyThose stripped bare in the AI euphoric wave are poised to confront the stark reality of a receding tide revealing an unforgiving coastline.